How not to waste a crisis: a qualitative study of problem definition and its consequences in three hospitals

Published in

Citation

Martin, G., Ozieranski, P., Leslie, M., & Dixon-Woods, M. (2019). How not to waste a crisis: a qualitative study of problem definition and its consequences in three hospitals. Journal of Health Services Research & Policyhttps://doi.org/10.1177/1355819619828403

  • 06 March 2019

Contributors

Why it matters

Despite an increased focus on quality and safety in recent years, certain problems in healthcare get more attention than others.

Efforts to make surgery safer, for example, have led to significant improvements, while safety issues in mental healthcare haven’t seen the same research and policy attention. It remains unclear how healthcare organisations identify problems, define them, prioritise them, and match them with solutions.

So how does a problem of quality or safety become a problem? And what implications does this have for what organisations do about it?

Our approach

Our study looked at three UK hospitals to examine how senior managers came to identify and characterise patient safety problems and organise responses.

We conducted interviews with managers, clinicians and other staff, observed hospital staff on the job, and reviewed relevant hospital documents.

To analyse our findings, we used insights from social and political science literature on how problems get prioritised or marginalised, and looked at how that affected improvement efforts in the three hospitals.

What we found

In each hospital, it took certain triggers to recognise quality and safety problems. And there were key differences in how they defined those problems.

How problems were ‘constructed’ influenced how they were received by frontline staff. It also impacted the perception of who ‘owned’ the problem and who was responsible for improving them.

When trying to engage staff in improvement efforts, it’s important to carefully balance personal accountability, systems improvement, and the use of data and feedback.

Hospital 1

Hospital 2

Hospital 3

 

 

Read the full article

 

Licensed under Creative Commons

These symbols show that the contents of this page are published under a Creative Commons licence called CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0.

It means that you’re free to reuse this work. In fact, we encourage it. We want our research to reach people who can help improve quality and safety in healthcare. But we do have a few rules:

  • Make sure you acknowledge The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute (THIS Institute) as the creator and link back to this webpage.
  • You can’t sell this work for a fee, or use it for any activity that generates revenue without our permission.
  • Please don’t distribute a modified version to others without our permission.

You can read the fine print about the licence on the Creative Commons website. It’s meant to help us keep the integrity of our work and stay true to our values.

But ultimately we want our work to have impact. So if you’ve got a use in mind but you’re not sure it’s allowed, just ask us at enquiries@thisinstitute.cam.ac.uk