Can Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment be delivered without the need for geriatricians? A formative evaluation in two perioperative surgical settings

Published in


David Kocman, Emma Regen, Kay Phelps, Graham Martin, Stuart Parker, Thomas Gilbert, Simon Conroy, Can comprehensive geriatric assessment be delivered without the need for geriatricians? A formative evaluation in two perioperative surgical settings, Age and Ageing, afz025.

  • 22 March 2019


Why it matters

Most older people will need acute care services at least once every four years. And when they do go into hospital, they are at a high risk of poor outcomes.

Older people who show signs of frailty are especially vulnerable. They are six times more likely to have a prolonged hospital stay, 50% more likely to be quickly readmitted, and 70% more likely to die than those who are not frail.

Some of these risks can be mitigated by using a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA), a process to identify the complex needs of frail older people and develop and deliver a plan to meet those needs. CGA has been shown to reduce mortality and institutionalisation, but it is only implemented in certain areas of many acute hospitals.

This study aimed to find out whether the principles of CGA can be embedded in hospital units where it is not part of routine practice, and whether it can be done without the need for geriatricians.

Our approach

The study involved developing, piloting, and evaluating a complex intervention to help non-geriatric teams improve the care they offer to frail older people.

This intervention took the form of a toolkit based on the principles of CGA, which was developed using qualitative methods, a literature review, and co-production with stakeholders, including patients and members of the public.

The toolkit was then piloted with healthcare staff in peri-operative/surgical cancer care in two large teaching hospitals in the UK. Over 12 months, a qualitative evaluation was conducted.

What we found

Read the article

Licensed under Creative Commons

These symbols show that the contents of this page are published under a Creative Commons licence called CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0.

It means that you’re free to reuse this work. In fact, we encourage it. We want our research to reach people who can help improve quality and safety in healthcare. But we do have a few rules:

  • Make sure you acknowledge The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute (THIS Institute) as the creator and link back to this webpage.
  • You can’t sell this work for a fee, or use it for any activity that generates revenue without our permission.
  • Please don’t distribute a modified version to others without our permission.

You can read the fine print about the licence on the Creative Commons website. It’s meant to help us keep the integrity of our work and stay true to our values.

But ultimately we want our work to have impact. So if you’ve got a use in mind but you’re not sure it’s allowed, just ask us at