A mixed-methods study of challenges experienced by clinical teams in measuring improvement

Published in


Woodcock T, Liberati EG, Dixon-Woods M. A mixed-methods study of challenges experienced by clinical teams in measuring improvement. BMJ Quality & Safety Published Online First: 24 August 2019. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009048

  • 12 November 2019


Why it matters

Quality improvement projects don’t always generate reliable or useful data, and problems in measurement, data collection, and interpretation are often to blame.

These problems can arise from disagreements about which types of measures to prioritise, faulty data collection systems, or when externally imposed measures are perceived as irrelevant or inappropriate, for example. Without useful and reliable data, it can be hard to say whether improvement interventions are successful, and this risks eroding confidence in the evidence base for improvement.

One possible solution could be for clinical teams to measure improvement themselves, choosing their own measures and designing and implementing data collection systems fitted to their own local circumstances. Yet little evidence exists on how well this works in practice.

In this article, we report how some clinical teams have fared using locally selected measures, explore the challenges they faced, and suggest approaches to overcome them.

Our approach

We evaluated a major patient safety improvement programme run in the UK, which used an approach known as Safer Clinical Systems. As part of this approach, multidisciplinary teams of frontline clinicians at nine NHS hospitals took part in the programme between 2011 and 2016.

In this mixed methods study, we used a qualitative approach to study the participating teams’ experiences and perception of measurement, while also reviewing the measurement plans and data collected by the teams for the programme.

What we found

Read the full article

Licensed under Creative Commons

These symbols show that the contents of this page are published under a Creative Commons licence called CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0.

It means that you’re free to reuse this work. In fact, we encourage it. We want our research to reach people who can help improve quality and safety in healthcare. But we do have a few rules:

  • Make sure you acknowledge The Healthcare Improvement Studies Institute (THIS Institute) as the creator and link back to this webpage.
  • You can’t sell this work for a fee, or use it for any activity that generates revenue without our permission.
  • Please don’t distribute a modified version to others without our permission.

You can read the fine print about the licence on the Creative Commons website. It’s meant to help us keep the integrity of our work and stay true to our values.

But ultimately we want our work to have impact. So if you’ve got a use in mind but you’re not sure it’s allowed, just ask us at enquiries@thisinstitute.cam.ac.uk